(Video) Kenya situation: ICC Prosecutor statement regarding charges against Francis Muthaura

[embedplusvideo height=”365″ width=”600″ standard=”″ vars=”ytid=X5odwmo0gys&width=600&height=365&start=&stop=&rs=w&hd=0&autoplay=0&react=0&chapters=&notes=” id=”ep2247″ /]

The International Criminal Court on Monday dropped all charges against Kenyan civil servant Francis Muthaura, who was accused alongside president-elect Uhuru Kenyatta of crimes against humanity during 2007-2008 post-election violence.

The decision came after a key witness in Muthaura’s case was discredited and after ICC chief prosecutor Fatou Bensouda said other witnesses refused to testify or had died.

“I have decided, as of the state of evidence available now, that we have no other choice but to withdraw the charges against Mr Muthaura,” Bensouda told The Hague-based court.

Four prominent Kenyans, including first-round presidential poll winner Kenyatta, faced charges at the ICC over deadly post-poll violence five years ago during which prosecutors say more than 1,100 people died.

But prosecutors dropped the key witness against Muthaura “after this witness recanted a crucial part of his evidence, and admitted to us that he had accepted bribes,” the ICC’s Bensouda said.

Some witnesses were refusing or unable to provide vital evidence, she added.

“The witnesses that had conveyed evidence have been killed or died, others refuse to speak to the prosecutor,” Bensouda said.

“We do not feel there are reasonable chances of a condemnation at the moment of the trial,” she said.

The cases of Kenyatta and Muthaura were postponed last month after a key prosecution witness withdrew a statement, casting doubts on the strength of the prosecution’s case.

But Bensouda stressed that the other Kenyan cases should proceed as planned: “This decision applies only to Mr Muthaura. It does not apply to any other case.”

“While we are all aware of political developments in Kenya, these have no influence, at all, on the decisions that I make as prosecutor of the International Criminal Court,” Bensouda said.

Bensouda lamented a lack of cooperation from the Kenyan government in the case.

She cited “the disappointing fact that the government of Kenya failed to provide my office with important evidence, and failed to facilitate our access to critical witnesses who may have shed light on the Muthaura case.”

Kenyatta and Muthaura both were charged with five counts of crimes against humanity for their alleged involvement in fomenting the wave of violence that swept through Kenya in December 2007 and early 2008.

The Kenyan opposition disputed the outcome of a presidential vote, unleashing the worst unrest in the east African country since independence in 1963.

More than 663,000 people were displaced in Kenya’s Rift Valley after fights between rival supporters, prosecutors said, when politically motivated riots soon turned into ethnic killings, which in turn sparked further reprisals.

The clashes destroyed Kenya’s image as a beacon of stability in the region, hurt its tourism industry and exposed long-simmering ethnic rifts among its population.

Muthaura, who was in court on Monday, was accused of authorising police use of excessive force against protesters and of having protected youth militia members of the Party of National Unity of the election’s winner, Mwai Kibaki.

He also allegedly took part in meetings during which attacks were planned.

Following his election victory, which some say was helped by the fact that he was charged by the ICC, Kenyatta vowed that he would cooperate “with all nations and international institutions”.-Nation

Related Images:



Tags: , , , ,
%d bloggers like this: